The Official Petroleum Intelligence
One in every three barrels of oil traded on the global market passes through a Swiss intermediary. No other country — not the United States, not the United Kingdom, not Singapore — controls a comparable share of the world's most strategically vital commodity. This extraordinary dominance, estimated at 35% of global oil trade by the Swiss government and corroborated by Public Eye, represents the single most concentrated node in the global energy supply chain. And its operational epicenter is Canton of Zug.
Switzerland handles approximately 700 million metric tons of crude oil and petroleum products annually, worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Yet these commodities never physically enter the country. They move from wellhead to refinery, from tanker to storage terminal, from producer to consumer — all intermediated by Swiss-registered firms operating from lakeside offices in Zug, Geneva, and Lugano. The physical infrastructure is elsewhere; the intelligence, capital, and deal-making authority resides in Switzerland.
This analysis examines why Canton of Zug stands at the center of this system, how its oil trading firms operate, and what forces — from geopolitical fragmentation to the energy transition — are reshaping the industry in 2026.
Switzerland's oil trading dominance is often described as accidental — a product of historical circumstance rather than strategic design. The reality is more nuanced. The modern Swiss commodity trading ecosystem was deliberately constructed through a combination of political neutrality, favorable tax policy, world-class trade finance, and regulatory pragmatism that created irresistible gravitational pull for the world's largest energy traders.
The genesis traces to 1974, when Marc Rich established Marc Rich + Co AG in Zug — the firm that would eventually become Glencore. Rich chose Zug for its low corporate tax rate, convertible currency, banking secrecy (at the time), and proximity to European financial centers without the regulatory burden of London or New York. His success attracted imitators. By the 1990s, Geneva had become the global center for oil trading, while Zug anchored metals and diversified commodity trading.
Today, the Swiss oil trading ecosystem operates as a sophisticated two-hub structure. Geneva hosts the pure-play oil and agricultural commodity traders — Vitol, Trafigura, Gunvor, Mercuria — while Zug serves as the base for diversified commodity-mining giants (Glencore), specialist petrochemical traders (Kolmar Group), and mid-market energy firms (VARO Energy, MET Group, Central Energy). Together, they form what Lindemann Law describes as the world's most influential commodity trading center.
The Swiss oil trading hub rests on five reinforcing pillars that no competitor has successfully replicated in combination:
Five firms dominate Swiss oil trading, collectively handling volumes that exceed the daily consumption of most continents. Their combined equity approaches $60 billion, their combined annual revenues exceed $800 billion, and their physical trading volumes represent a significant percentage of all oil that moves on the world's oceans.
Vitol is the world's largest independent oil trader, handling approximately 7.2 million barrels per day — more than the daily consumption of Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom combined. Founded in Rotterdam in 1966 and now headquartered in Geneva, Vitol posted a net profit of $8.7 billion in 2024, down from $13.2 billion in 2023 and a record $15.1 billion in 2022. The firm's equity stands at $30.7 billion with debt of just $3.6 billion — a fortress balance sheet that proved decisive during the 2022 energy crisis when cash-rich Vitol could absorb margin calls and exploit market dislocations.
Vitol is owned by approximately 450 of its senior executives. In 2024, the firm paid a record $10.6 billion share buyback — an average of roughly $23 million per partner. Under CEO Russell Hardy, Vitol has invested in downstream assets: the Saras refinery in Italy (the Mediterranean's largest), BP's Turkish fuel network, South Africa's Engen brand, and the Adriatic LNG terminal. Hardy maintains that 70-80% of capital will remain focused on trading.
Trafigura is the world's second-largest private oil trader and the largest private metals trader, with $243.2 billion in group revenue for the fiscal year ending September 2024. Oil and fuel volumes reached 6.8 million bpd, up from 6.3 million in 2023. Net profit was $2.8 billion, down from $7.3 billion in 2023. Headquartered in Geneva with over 13,000 employees across 150+ countries, Trafigura has built a diversified model spanning oil, metals, minerals, gas, power, and renewables. Group equity reached a record $16.5 billion, and its European revolving credit facility hit a record $5.6 billion.
Glencore, headquartered in Baar (Canton of Zug), is the only publicly listed member of the Big Five, with $230.9 billion in total revenue in 2024. Its oil and gas division traded 3.7 million bpd of crude, products, and gas — up 12% from 3.3 million in 2023, but below its 4.8 million bpd 2019 peak. Energy EBIT fell 47% to $908 million as markets normalized from the extraordinary 2022-2023 volatility. Glencore expanded its oil portfolio through a joint takeover of Shell's 237,000 bpd Singapore refinery with Chandra Asri, a crude supply agreement for the UK's 113,000 bpd Lindsey refinery, and a $400 million debt deal with Tullow Oil to market Ghanaian and Gabonese crudes. In September 2025, Glencore promoted Kolupaev — its LNG head — to lead the combined oil and gas division, signaling an integrated energy strategy.
Gunvor, founded by Torbjörn Törnqvist and based in Geneva, is a major energy trader with multi-million bpd volumes and over $100 billion in annual revenue. In 2025, leadership changes refocused the firm on governance and expansion. Gunvor acquired a 75% stake in a Bilbao power plant and TotalEnergies' 50% stake in Pakistan's Pak-Arab Refinery. Mercuria, also Geneva-based, generated $174 billion in record revenue in 2022 and accumulated approximately $6.7 billion in equity. Both firms are expanding aggressively into metals trading, with Mercuria building a 150-person team and Gunvor rebuilding its base metals book.
| Firm | HQ | Oil Volume (bpd) | 2024 Profit | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitol | Geneva | ~7.2 million | $8.7B net | $30.7B |
| Trafigura | Geneva | ~6.8 million | $2.8B net | $16.5B |
| Glencore | Baar, Zug | ~3.7 million | $908M EBIT (energy) | Public (FTSE 100) |
| Gunvor | Geneva | Multi-million | Normalizing | ~$6B |
| Mercuria | Geneva | Multi-million | Normalizing | ~$6.7B |
While the Big Five dominate headlines, Canton of Zug hosts a deep bench of specialist oil and energy trading firms that collectively generate billions in revenue and employ thousands. These firms occupy niches that the giants cannot efficiently serve — regional petrochemical markets, specialty biofuels, mid-market crude offtake, and downstream distribution.
Kolmar Group AG, headquartered in Zug, is a privately-held petrochemical and oil products trading powerhouse founded in 1997. Originally established as Kolmar Petrochemicals AG with Marc Rich's involvement (through Marc Rich & Co Holding GmbH), the company has grown under CEO Ruth Sandelowsky into a diversified operator trading over 100 different products across 20+ countries with 24 global offices. Kolmar transacts approximately 6 million metric tons per year with annual revenue of approximately $5 billion and around 250 employees.
Kolmar's strategic pivot toward renewable fuels distinguishes it from pure-play oil traders. The company manufactures biodiesel in the United States through American Green Fuels (AGF) with production sites in Connecticut and Texas. In a landmark deal, Kolmar signed a financeable fuel supply agreement with Gevo for 45 million gallons per year of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable premium gasoline from Gevo's Net-Zero 2 facility — estimated at up to $2.8 billion in gross revenue over eight years. Kolmar has also invested in SynPet Technologies, acquiring global marketing rights for circular naphtha produced from recycled plastic waste. The firm holds an EcoVadis Gold sustainability rating.
VARO Energy operates in refining, marketing, and energy transition infrastructure across Northwestern Europe. MET Group, with 1,600 employees and operations in 10 European countries, focuses on natural gas, power, and oil trading — positioning itself at the intersection of traditional energy and the emerging gas-to-power transition. Central Energy, founded in 1997, specializes in oil products and biofuels with ISCC certification for biomass and bioenergy sustainability. SEFE Marketing & Trading (formerly Gazprom Marketing & Trading) handles gas and LNG. ORLEN Trading Switzerland serves as the Swiss oil trading arm of Poland's PKN ORLEN. Naftogaz Trading Europe manages natural gas marketing for Ukraine's national energy company from Switzerland.
The oil market entered 2026 under pressure. Brent crude closed 2025 at $60.75 per barrel — down nearly 20% for the year, the steepest annual decline since the COVID-19 pandemic and the third consecutive year of losses (the longest losing streak on record for Brent). Then came January 2026: US-Iran tensions escalated, North American winter storms disrupted 1.2 million bpd of production, and Brent surged $10 to trade around $70/bbl by mid-February.
The IEA's February 2026 Oil Market Report paints a bearish fundamental picture. Global oil supply is projected to rise by 2.4 million bpd in 2026 to 108.6 mb/d, with growth roughly evenly split between non-OPEC+ and OPEC+ producers. The IEA expects a surplus of approximately 4.25 million bpd in Q1 2026 — equal to roughly 4% of global demand. The US Energy Information Administration forecasts Brent averaging $58/bbl for full-year 2026, falling to $53/bbl in 2027. Goldman Sachs targets the mid-$50s. J.P. Morgan expects $58. Fitch forecasts $63.
OPEC+ reaffirmed on February 1 its plan to keep production flat through Q1 2026. But with 1.65 million bpd of voluntary cuts still in place, the alliance faces a delicate balancing act. Non-OPEC production — led by the United States (US shale oil from the Permian Basin), Brazil (pre-salt deepwater), Guyana (Liza Phase 2), and Canada (oil sands expansion) — continues to grow strongly. Global liquid fuels production grew by an estimated 3.0 million bpd in 2025 and is forecast to add another 1.6 million bpd in 2026. Global observed oil inventories rose by 477 million barrels in 2025 — an average build rate of 1.3 mb/d — and the EIA projects builds averaging 3.1 million bpd in 2026.
For oil price forecasting, the bearish fundamentals are difficult to dismiss. The S&P Global Commodity Insights Brent crude benchmark, the CME Group WTI futures complex, and the ICE Brent futures curve all reflect contango structures — where future prices exceed spot — signaling market expectations of oversupply. OECD commercial oil stocks have rebuilt significantly from the 2022-2023 drawdowns. China's strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) builds absorbed approximately 1.0 million bpd in 2025, providing a floor for prices, but the IEA expects these purchases to slow in 2027.
US-Iran tensions have added an estimated $4/bbl risk premium. The US warned all American-flagged ships to avoid Iranian waters when transiting the Strait of Hormuz — through which ~20% of global oil passes. BloombergNEF estimates that a complete halt to Iran's 3.3 mb/d exports (unlikely but possible) could push Brent to $71 in Q2 and as high as $91 in Q4 2026. Venezuelan production dropped to 780,000 bpd in January after the US blockade, though Vitol and Trafigura received licenses to transport Venezuelan crude — much of it redirected from China to US Gulf Coast refineries.
For Swiss oil traders, this environment is ideal. As Trafigura CFO Stephan Jansma noted at the FT Commodities Global Summit in Lausanne, profitability has reached a "new cruising altitude" — significantly below the 2022-2023 windfall but substantially above pre-COVID levels, driven by diversification across geographies and products.
Swiss traders are the dominant intermediaries for African crude oil — a position with enormous geopolitical and economic significance. Between 2011 and 2013, approximately 25% of oil purchased from African national oil companies went to Swiss commodity traders — over 500 million barrels valued at more than $55 billion. This volume equated to 12% of government revenue in those African producer nations and was double the total development aid they received.
Glencore's African oil footprint is extensive. Through Astron Energy in South Africa, Glencore owns and operates a 100,000 bpd crude oil refinery in Cape Town, a network of approximately 850 service stations, and a lubricants manufacturing plant in Durban. Glencore's $400 million debt deal with Tullow Oil (signed November 2023) secured marketing rights for Ghanaian and Gabonese crudes. Vitol acquired South Africa's Engen brand. Trafigura maintains extensive pre-payment facilities with African national oil companies.
The strategic significance extends beyond commercial profit. Swiss oil traders effectively control the financing, logistics, and marketing of a substantial share of African energy exports — giving Switzerland outsized influence over the fiscal revenues of developing nations and the supply security of importing economies.
The African crude oil trading landscape spans multiple producing regions, each with distinct grade characteristics and market dynamics. West African crude — Nigerian Bonny Light, Forcados, Qua Iboe; Angolan Girassol, Dalia, Cabinda; Ghanaian Jubilee TEN — is typically light-sweet and commands premiums for European and Asian refinery feedstock. North African crude — Libyan Es Sider, Sharara; Algerian Saharan Blend — flows into Mediterranean refineries. East African frontier — Ugandan Albertine Graben development, Kenyan Turkana early-stage — represents future supply sources that Swiss traders are positioning to offtake through pre-export finance structures. The African Development Bank estimates that Africa's oil and gas sector requires $125 billion in investment through 2030 to maintain production, creating significant opportunities for Swiss-intermediated trade finance and marketing agreements.
Oil trading is capital-intensive at a scale that dwarfs most industries. A single Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) holds approximately 2 million barrels of crude — worth $130-140 million at current Brent prices. A major Swiss oil trader may have dozens of such cargoes in transit at any time, requiring billions in revolving credit, letters of credit, and structured finance facilities.
The Swiss trade finance ecosystem has evolved over decades to serve this demand. Specialized desks at UBS, Zuger Kantonalbank, Crédit Agricole, ING, Société Générale, BNP Paribas, and MUFG provide the capital infrastructure. Trafigura's European revolving credit facility closed at a record $5.6 billion in March 2025. The firm has also tapped $6 billion in ECA-funded facilities from export credit agencies. Gunvor secured a $1.335 billion Asia revolving credit facility with sustainability-linked KPIs in 2025.
The Swiss National Bank's 0% policy rate (since June 2025) creates favorable CHF-denominated trade finance conditions. With the Swiss franc as a stable, convertible currency and Swiss banks offering specialized commodity trade finance products — pre-export finance, receivables discounting, inventory finance, and structured prepayment facilities — the financial infrastructure provides Swiss oil traders with a liquidity advantage that few competing hubs can match.
The breadth of oil trade finance instruments available in Switzerland deserves detailed analysis. Letters of credit (LCs) remain the backbone — documentary LCs for physical crude cargoes, standby LCs for performance guarantees, and confirmed LCs for counterparty risk mitigation in frontier markets. Pre-export finance structures allow Swiss traders to advance capital to producers (particularly in Africa and Latin America) against future crude deliveries — Glencore's $400 million Tullow Oil deal exemplifies this model. Revolving credit facilities (RCFs) provide the working capital liquidity that enables traders to hold multiple cargoes simultaneously; Trafigura's $5.6 billion European RCF and Gunvor's $1.335 billion Asia facility are industry-leading examples.
Increasingly, sustainability-linked loans (SLLs) and green bonds are entering the oil trade finance toolkit. Gunvor's 2025 Asia RCF included sustainability KPIs tied to emissions reduction and ESG reporting standards. IFC and other development finance institutions have structured commodity-linked climate finance products. Insurance and credit risk mitigation — through Lloyd's of London syndicates, Swiss Re, and specialized commodity credit insurers — adds another layer to the trade finance ecosystem. The total value of Swiss-intermediated oil trade finance is estimated in the hundreds of billions annually, making Switzerland the single most important jurisdiction for energy commodity financing globally.
For oil trading firms evaluating Swiss company formation, the trade finance infrastructure represents a decisive competitive advantage. Access to the Swiss banking system's commodity desks, combined with Switzerland's AAA sovereign credit rating, stable legal framework, and specialized commodity trading advisory ecosystem (EY, KPMG, PwC, and boutique firms like Lindemann Law), creates a capital-efficient operating environment that reduces the cost of trade finance relative to competing jurisdictions.
The world's oil traders face an existential question: what happens when demand peaks? The IEA projects global fossil fuel demand will peak by 2030. Vitol's own analysis, published in February 2026, forecasts oil demand peaking at around 110 million bpd and remaining at current levels for at least 15 years — a more bullish outlook than the IEA. The EIA projects Brent declining toward roughly $54/bbl by 2027 under current policies.
Swiss oil traders are responding with three strategic adaptations:
Vitol acquired Italy's Saras refinery (the Mediterranean's largest), the Adriatic LNG terminal, and BP's Turkish fuel network. Glencore took a stake in Shell's Singapore refinery and acquired FincoEnergies in the Netherlands (December 2025). Trafigura purchased Greenergy's European and Canadian businesses (including UK fuel distribution) and joined the consortium acquiring Fos-sur-Mer refinery from ExxonMobil. These acquisitions secure physical flow optionality — the ability to direct crude to owned refining capacity and capture margins across the value chain.
Natural gas and LNG represent the "bridge fuel" opportunity. Glencore's promotion of its LNG head to lead the combined oil and gas division signals strategic intent. Gunvor acquired a Bilbao power plant and Pakistan refinery assets. MET Group (1,600 employees) operates across gas, power, and oil in 10 European countries. Trafigura described gas, power, and renewables as a "third pillar" alongside oil and metals.
Kolmar Group leads Zug's biofuel positioning. Its Gevo SAF partnership, American Green Fuels biodiesel manufacturing, and SynPet circular naphtha investment create a vertically integrated renewable fuels platform. Kolmar's EcoVadis Gold rating signals institutional credibility. Central Energy's ISCC certification positions it for biomass and bioenergy trading. The global SAF market alone is projected to reach $15+ billion by 2030, driven by ICAO CORSIA mandates and EU ReFuelEU Aviation targets.
The biofuel and circular economy opportunity extends well beyond SAF. Biodiesel (B100 and blends) is traded in volumes exceeding 40 billion liters annually, with Kolmar's American Green Fuels producing at plants in Connecticut and Texas. Renewable diesel (HVO — hydrotreated vegetable oil) commands premium pricing over conventional diesel and is gaining market share in Europe under the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) mandates. Ethanol trading — both fuel-grade and industrial — flows through Swiss intermediaries at scale. Circular naphtha — produced from chemical recycling of plastic waste through pyrolysis — represents a frontier opportunity that Kolmar is pursuing through its SynPet Technologies investment, with ambitions to supply circular feedstock to petrochemical steam crackers across Europe.
Carbon credit trading has emerged as a significant new commodity class for Swiss firms. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) — with allowance prices historically ranging from €50-100 per tonne — creates substantial trading opportunities for firms with energy market expertise. Voluntary carbon markets, though smaller, attract Swiss commodity traders with experience in price discovery, logistics, and counterparty risk management. Sygnum Bank in Zug's Crypto Valley has developed tokenized carbon credit products. Hydrogen trading — both green (electrolysis-derived) and blue (CCS-enabled) — is expected to develop into a commoditized market by the late 2020s, with Swiss traders positioning early. Renewable energy certificates (RECs) and guarantees of origin (GOs) are already actively traded through Swiss energy desks.
Switzerland's historically light-touch regulatory approach to commodity trading is evolving under domestic and international pressure. Several regulatory developments are reshaping the compliance landscape for Zug's oil traders:
SUISSENÉGOCE, the Swiss Commodity Trading Association, continues to engage with federal and cantonal authorities on regulatory calibration. Public Eye has called for a dedicated Swiss commodities supervisory authority ("ROHMA"), while the industry argues existing frameworks provide adequate governance. The tension between transparency demands and competitive advantage remains the central regulatory debate.
Understanding Zug's oil trading position requires comparing it to Geneva — the other pole of the Swiss commodity axis. The two hubs are complementary rather than competitive, but their differences reveal important strategic dynamics.
| Attribute | Zug | Geneva |
|---|---|---|
| Primary oil focus | Diversified (metals + energy) | Pure oil & agricultural |
| Anchor firms | Glencore, Kolmar, MET, VARO | Vitol, Trafigura, Gunvor, Mercuria |
| Corporate tax rate | 11.85% | ~14% |
| Oil trading identity | Petrochemicals, diversified energy | Crude oil, refined products |
| Unique advantage | Crypto Valley tech ecosystem | University of Geneva commodity programs |
| Cluster character | Dense, industrial, mid-market | Elite, high-volume, dealmaking |
| Industry association | ZCA (40+ members) | GTSA (Geneva Trading & Shipping Association) |
Geneva is unambiguously the larger oil trading hub by volume — Vitol and Trafigura alone handle 14 million bpd combined. But Zug offers structural advantages: lower taxes, a unique technology ecosystem through Crypto Valley (enabling blockchain-based trade finance innovation), and Glencore's gravitational pull which attracts services, talent, and supporting businesses. For specialist oil traders — petrochemical-focused firms like Kolmar, mid-market crude offtakers, and firms with hybrid energy-tech models — Zug increasingly represents the optimal Swiss base.
Beyond the Swiss internal Zug-Geneva dynamic, oil trading firms evaluate a broader set of global hubs. The following comparison illustrates why Switzerland — and Zug in particular — maintains its dominance for oil trading company formation and operations:
| Hub | Corp. Tax | Oil Specialization | Anchor Firms | Trade Finance | Key Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zug | 11.85% | Diversified energy + metals | Glencore, Kolmar | UBS, ZKB, int'l banks | Lowest Swiss tax, Crypto Valley tech |
| Geneva | ~14% | Crude oil, refined products | Vitol, Trafigura, Gunvor, Mercuria | Deep bank network | Largest oil trading cluster globally |
| Singapore | 17% | Asian crude, LNG, fuel oil | Trafigura Asia, BP, Shell | DBS, OCBC, int'l banks | Asian time zone access |
| London | 25% | Brent pricing, oil derivatives | Shell, bp, Glencore oil HQ | Global banking center | ICE Brent, derivatives liquidity |
| Houston | 21% (fed) | WTI, US shale, refining | Vitol USA, Trafigura USA, IOCs | US banking system | Largest producer-consumer market |
| Dubai (DMCC) | 9% | Middle East crude, fuel oil | Litasco, BB Energy, regional | Emerging hub | Low tax, ME proximity |
Switzerland's combined Zug-Geneva axis handles approximately 35% of global oil — a market share that no other jurisdiction approaches. Singapore handles an estimated 15-20% of Asian oil flows; London dominates oil derivatives pricing through ICE Brent but has lost physical trading volume to Geneva due to tax and regulatory pressures; Houston is the epicenter of US crude marketing but serves primarily domestic flows; Dubai is growing but lacks the trade finance infrastructure and regulatory maturity of Swiss hubs. For oil trading firms evaluating jurisdiction selection, Switzerland's combination of tax efficiency, neutrality, trade finance, and cluster density remains unmatched.
The Swiss oil trading industry employs thousands of professionals across trading, risk management, logistics, finance, legal, compliance, and technology. The talent ecosystem supporting Zug and Geneva includes:
Executive compensation in Swiss oil trading routinely exceeds CHF 200,000 at the senior trader level, with top performers at the Big Five earning substantially more through profit-sharing and equity participation. Vitol's 450 partners averaged roughly $23 million each in the 2024 buyback; Trafigura distributed $5.9 billion to its 1,400 employee-shareholders in FY2023.
The oil trading career pipeline in Switzerland is one of the most lucrative in global finance. Entry-level oil trading analyst positions at major Swiss firms typically command CHF 90,000-130,000 base salary plus performance bonuses. Mid-career oil traders (5-10 years experience) in physical crude or products can expect CHF 200,000-400,000 total compensation. Senior oil traders and desk heads at Vitol, Trafigura, or Glencore earn well into seven figures, with profit participation structures that have created hundreds of multimillionaires. Risk management professionals — VaR analysts, options pricing specialists, and commodity derivatives structurers — command premiums of 20-40% above general financial services due to the specialized nature of commodity risk. CTRM/ETRM technology professionals who can implement and optimize commodity trading risk management software systems (Openlink, ION/Aspect, Brady, and proprietary platforms) are in exceptionally high demand.
For professionals considering an oil trading career path, the educational prerequisites have evolved. While a commodity trading MBA or finance degree remains valued, the industry increasingly recruits from engineering, data science, mathematics, and supply chain logistics backgrounds. The CAS Commodity Professional program at HSLU provides a fast-track entry point for career changers. Industry conferences — including the FT Commodities Global Summit in Lausanne, IP Week in London, and APPEC in Singapore — serve as critical networking venues. The Commodity Club Switzerland facilitates year-round professional connections in the Zug-Zurich corridor.
Swiss work permits for commodity trading professionals are processed efficiently under the bilateral agreements with EU/EFTA countries. Third-country nationals typically secure B permits through employer sponsorship, with the commodity trading sector designated as a priority industry by cantonal economic development offices. The combination of tax efficiency, compensation levels, quality of life (Zug ranked #1 globally by InterNations), international schooling options, and career advancement opportunities makes Switzerland the most attractive jurisdiction for oil trading talent globally.
The Swiss oil trading industry enters the second half of the decade from a position of extraordinary strength. Combined equity of nearly $60 billion provides unprecedented capacity for asset acquisition, geographic expansion, and diversification. But the structural challenges are equally unprecedented:
The most likely outcome is continued dominance with structural adaptation. Switzerland's oil trading ecosystem — 200+ firms in Zug alone, five of the world's ten largest independent oil traders, ~35% global oil market share, and $60 billion in combined equity — represents a self-reinforcing cluster that would take decades to replicate elsewhere. The firms will evolve from pure oil traders to diversified energy and commodities conglomerates. Zug will remain a critical node.
As McKinsey Global Institute has observed, the $3.5 trillion annual investment required for the energy transition through 2050 will flow disproportionately through commodity trading intermediaries. Swiss oil traders — with their capital, logistics networks, risk management expertise, and geopolitical neutrality — are positioned to capture a substantial share of this transition infrastructure. The question is not whether Zug's oil trading cluster survives the energy transition, but whether it leads it.
For investors, traders, and analysts tracking oil price predictions, the following institutional forecasts provide a reference framework for crude oil price expectations through the end of the decade:
| Institution | 2026 Brent Forecast | 2027+ | Key Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIA (STEO Feb 2026) | $58/bbl average | $53/bbl (2027) | 3.1 mb/d inventory builds; OPEC+ flat |
| IEA (OMR Feb 2026) | ~$70 current, declining | Supply outpaces demand | 4.25 mb/d surplus Q1 2026 |
| Goldman Sachs | Mid-$50s | $75 (2030-2035 avg) | Oversupply, lower-for-longer |
| J.P. Morgan | $58 | — | Trump admin prioritizes low prices |
| Fitch Ratings | $63 | — | Moderate demand growth |
| Trading Economics | $69 Q1 → $75 12-mo | — | Geopolitical risk premium persists |
| BloombergNEF (disruption) | $71-91 (Iran scenario) | — | Full Iran export halt (3.3 mb/d) |
| Vitol (corporate) | — | ~110 mb/d peak, 15+ yr plateau | Oil demand remains robust through 2040 |
| Equinor (long-term) | — | $75 (2030-2040) | Balanced transition scenario |
Switzerland handles approximately 35% of global oil trade through firms headquartered primarily in Geneva and Zug. This dominance stems from political neutrality, favorable corporate tax rates (11.85% in Zug), world-class trade finance infrastructure, central European time zone enabling Asia-Americas coverage, and decades of cluster development since Marc Rich founded what became Glencore in Zug in 1974. Together, Geneva and Zug manage approximately 700 million metric tons of crude and petroleum products annually.
Glencore traded 3.7 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil, oil products and gas in 2024, up from 3.3 million bpd in 2023. While volumes are recovering, they remain below the 4.8 million bpd peak in 2019. Glencore's oil and gas headquarters are in London, while the parent company is headquartered in Baar, Canton of Zug. Energy EBIT was $908 million in 2024. In September 2025, Glencore promoted its LNG chief to lead the combined oil and gas division.
Brent crude traded around $68-70/bbl in February 2026, supported by US-Iran tensions. The EIA forecasts Brent averaging $58/bbl for 2026, down from $69 in 2025. Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan target the mid-$50s. The IEA expects a surplus of 4.25 mb/d in Q1 2026. However, BloombergNEF estimates a complete halt to Iran's 3.3 mb/d exports could push Brent to $91 in Q4. OPEC+ has maintained flat production through Q1 2026.
The Big Five: Vitol (Geneva, 7.2M bpd, $8.7B profit), Trafigura (Geneva, 6.8M bpd, $243.2B revenue), Glencore (Baar/Zug, 3.7M bpd, $230.9B revenue), Gunvor (Geneva), and Mercuria (Geneva). Zug also hosts Kolmar Group ($5B revenue, 100+ products), VARO Energy, MET Group (1,600 employees), Central Energy, SEFE, ORLEN Trading, and Naftogaz Trading Europe. Combined equity across the Big Four private traders approaches $60 billion.
Kolmar Group AG is a privately-held petrochemical and oil products trader headquartered in Zug, founded in 1997 with Marc Rich's involvement. Under CEO Ruth Sandelowsky, Kolmar trades 100+ products across 20+ countries with ~$5B revenue and 6 million metric tons annually. Kolmar leads Zug's renewable fuels pivot through American Green Fuels (biodiesel in Connecticut and Texas), a Gevo SAF partnership (45M gallons/year, $2.8B over 8 years), and SynPet circular naphtha investment. Holds EcoVadis Gold.
Canton of Zug has an effective corporate tax rate of 11.85%, the lowest in Switzerland. This compares to approximately 14% in Geneva, 17% in Singapore, 25% in the UK, and approximately 30% in Germany. For high-volume oil trading — where a single VLCC cargo represents $130-150 million — the cumulative tax differential translates to hundreds of millions in annual savings. OECD Pillar Two (15% minimum) applies only to firms with EUR 750M+ revenue.
Switzerland has no dedicated commodity trading supervisory authority. Oil traders are subject to general Swiss corporate law, the revised AMLA (September 2025) with commodity advisor due diligence for CHF 5M+ transactions, OECD Pillar Two minimum tax, FINMA regulation of commodity-linked financial products, and the Swiss Code of Obligations (ESG reporting, conflict minerals due diligence). SUISSENÉGOCE advocates for the industry. Public Eye has called for a dedicated supervisory body ("ROHMA").
The IEA's February 2026 Oil Market Report projects global supply rising 2.4 million bpd to 108.6 mb/d, with a Q1 surplus of 4.25 mb/d. World oil supply plunged 1.2 mb/d in January due to North American winter storms. OPEC+ reaffirmed flat production through March. Refinery throughputs are forecast to increase 790 kb/d in 2026. Global inventories rose 477 mb in 2025 (1.3 mb/d average builds). India's Russian crude imports fell to 1.1 mb/d (lowest since November 2022) while China's hit all-time highs.
Three strategies: downstream integration (Vitol acquiring Saras refinery, Glencore taking Shell Singapore refinery, Trafigura buying Fos-sur-Mer), gas/power/LNG expansion (Gunvor's Bilbao power plant, MET Group's 10-country gas/power operations), and biofuels/circular economy (Kolmar's Gevo SAF partnership for 45M gallons/year, American Green Fuels biodiesel, SynPet circular naphtha). Vitol forecasts oil demand remaining at ~110 mb/d for 15+ years; the IEA projects fossil fuel demand peaking by 2030.
Swiss traders are dominant buyers of African crude. Between 2011-2013, approximately 25% of oil purchased from African national oil companies went to Swiss traders — over 500 million barrels worth $55 billion (12% of those governments' revenue, 2x total development aid). Glencore operates South Africa's Astron Energy (100,000 bpd refinery, 850 service stations). Vitol acquired Engen. Glencore secured Tullow Oil crude marketing rights for Ghana and Gabon through a $400M debt deal.
Vitol is the world's largest independent oil trader at ~7.2M bpd with $8.7B net profit (2024) and $30.7B equity. Glencore traded 3.7M bpd with $908M energy EBIT. Key differences: Vitol is privately held (~450 partners, Geneva), while Glencore is publicly listed (FTSE 100, Baar/Zug). Vitol is a pure trader expanding into downstream; Glencore integrates mining, trading, and industrial assets across 60+ commodities. Vitol's centralized financing model and $30.7B equity vs. $3.6B debt contrasts with Trafigura's $16.5B equity vs. $31B debt.
Physical crude and products trading, derivatives/paper trading, risk management (VaR, hedging), trade finance, shipping and chartering, refinery operations, LNG/gas marketing, compliance, and CTRM/ETRM technology systems. HSLU offers a CAS Commodity Professional program at its Suurstoffi campus. Executive compensation routinely exceeds CHF 200,000. Specialist recruiters include Swisslinx, Altus Search, HC Group, and Cititec. Vitol's partners averaged ~$23M each in 2024; Trafigura distributed $5.9B to 1,400 employee-shareholders in FY2023.
We use cookies for analytics and ad personalization. See our Privacy Policy.